Dr. P-J
  • Blog
  • Non-Fiction
    • Memoirs >
      • Cruise Log - 2023 >
        • Cruise Log - Day 00
        • Cruise Log - Day 01
        • Cruise Log - Day 02
        • Cruise Log - Day 03
        • Cruise Log - Day 04
        • Cruise Log - Day 05
      • Swimming Through My Life
      • Pennies on the Railroad Tracks
      • A Chronology
      • Growing Up a Pineo
    • A Charmed Life - by my brother Noel
    • Other Non-Fiction >
      • The Time I Didn't Really Almost Die
      • GCO Report
  • Fiction
    • A Day Late and a Dollar Short - Part II
    • Madge Moves On
    • White Out
    • A Day Late and a Dollar Short - Part I
    • No Way Out
    • Star Crossed Lovers
    • Tick Vision
    • The Red Dress
  • Poetry
    • On Becoming a Ghost
    • Monique
    • I Am an Ocean
    • Ostara on I-95
    • Soul Garden
    • My Father Kept Secrets
    • Born Under the Sign of Seattle
    • Tick Vision
  • RECIPES
    • "Quiet Time" Oatmeal
    • Curried Sweet Potato Patties
    • Rice Pudding
  • Queer Theory
    • Neo-Feminism
    • Queer Theory
    • Culture is a Construct
    • Theoretical Underpinnings
    • Dismantling Patriarchy
  • Archives
    • Home
    • The Rest >
      • Bernie Sanders 2020 VA
      • Bernie Sanders 2016 >
        • Report from a Sanders Delegate
        • Bernie Sanders on the Issues >
          • How Bernie Pays for His Proposals
          • The Issues
        • Foreign Policy
        • Inequality
        • Not-Bernie
        • Anonymous Archives
        • Data Collection and Analysis
        • Favorite Videos
        • Memes about Bernie
        • Help Fund My Trip to Philly
        • Super Delegates
      • Advocacy
      • Random Rants
      • Music Videos >
        • It's My Party
        • Blue Pearl
        • Best Covers
    • Theory >
      • The Economic System is Constructed
    • Issues >
      • Progressive Revolution >
        • Definitions
        • Election News
        • Revolutionary >
          • Revolution
          • An Advanced Organizer for the REVOLUTION
          • Reliable Media Sources
          • Privacy
          • Stop "Googling" it
          • How to Create a Press Release
        • Democratic Party >
          • Current Events
          • Democratic Party - Good News
          • Democratic Party - Bad News
          • Matt Rowe
      • ADA >
        • DNC Research Project >
          • My Convention Narrative
          • ADA Research Project
          • Raw Data - Stories from the Convention
          • Brief Analysis of Data
        • DVPA disAbility Caucus
      • #NoDAPL
      • Anti-Democratic Practices
      • Purple Thumb Voting System
      • Monsanto
      • TPP
      • Income Inequality
      • Corruption of the Media
      • The Yoke of Corporatization
    • Search
  • About
    • Contact
    • Social Media
    • Publications
    • Op-Eds
  • Search

Dr. P-J's Blog

Van Gogh Exhibit in DC

8/17/2021

6 Comments

 
as8/17/21
Yesterday I saw the Van Gogh Exhibit in DC. 
I wish now I had taken pictures of the things that disturbed me about the exhibit . . . But I did get a few photographs of things I liked about it.

Overall, I highly recommend this show:
  • There is an interesting set up of images of vases projected onto a large bias relief style vase. Comparing the vases was an amusing exercise, if a bit small potatoes.
  • There is a model of The Bedroom that you can walk into. You can sit in there, have your picture taken. Wow factor is high on that piece.
  • In that same section there is a deconstructed model of one of the Japanese paintings and a three dimensional construction of the lobby/entrance to the mental institution. Fascinating.
  • The largest room is immersive in its own right. Some of it is not really about Van Gogh, but it is still interesting.
  • ​The close look at all his self portraits is wonderful. His eyes are piercing and he's looking right at YOU. He's intimidating.
  • The coloring room seems like it is for children, but that was also really enjoyable. Just do it.
  • You have to pay extra to be a VIP - DO IT! You then get to do an additional 3D immersive experience at the end plus you then get a lanyard, a badge, and a poster, all with starry night decor. The 3D googles were hard to fit on and the whole thing made me car sick, but WOW was that an amazing trip. You start in Van Gogh's bedroom that he so famously painted, check out some buildings in the village, walk past a windmill, walk (glide really) through a wheat field and then a Pissarro-esque forest, then come into the village where the outdoor nightclub is there on your right and then down the street to the quay. So many paintings brought to life and you get to travel through them, looking all around. Are the mountains in the background authentic to Arles? I dunno.​
On the down side:
  • One of the panels tells us the largest amounts of money ever paid for Van Gogh paintings. This elevation of the economic value of these objects - as though their worth is amplified because rich individuals and corporations speculate on the value of art - is beneath contempt. It has no place in an art gallery.
  • Speculative theories are presented as fact and they denigrate the contribution of the artist. For example, with no further evidence that some modern eye doctor thinks he's proven it, Van Gogh's inventive mastery of color is chalked up to the "fact" that he was color blind. In other words, he didn't invent it! He was just a victim of color blindness. That really ticked me off. There is  zero contemporaneous fact offered to support this claim, although he was seen by numerous doctors, wrote thousands of letters discussing his life, and consulted with (hobnobbed?) scores of other artists.
  • In another presentation, we hear the voice of someone claiming to have a profound understanding of the symbolism of Starry Night - in which the stars are the light of optimism and the village is the darkness of despair. The cyprus tree unites these two opposing forces - bridges the gap. Van Gogh's letters are quoted repetitively in the exhibit. There is NO evidence provided of any kind that Van Gogh intended his works to have symbolic content. Yes, we are all subject to Jung's collective unconscious - communication by symbols is the universal human condition. But to ascribe these thoughts relating to Van Gogh's mental illness is unsupported by fact and demeans the artist. It's just speculation that looks like click bait. Do we care about Sylvia Plath's work because she killed herself? Are we just prurient consumers of morbid lives?
  • They made a big deal about Van Gogh's last painting, of roots, as somehow manifesting his depressed state, while ignoring other works that had a similar structure of bare wood and the unvarnished truth about nature, not prettified. I found it odd that the curators, who made a big deal about his suicide, did not bother to mention the counter-theories that he was shot by an unsettled teenager. If we are going to dig around in the mud - why not bring up the controversy about that? But no - it didn't fit in with the producers narrative that he was not a suicidal individual.
  • The obsession about his mental illness and suicide seemed to be of a piece of the current obsession with the lives of famous people - someone kidnapped Lady Gaga's dogs - news at 11; Robert Downey Jr. got loaded and went and slept in a bed at the neighbor's house by mistake, now you can dislike him rather than appreciate his art. I admire these artists but knowing this level of information about their personal lives is degrading to all of us. Pitching Van Gogh as a color-blind suicidal nut-job - why is that needed? There is SO  MUCH to discuss about art without bringing that up. 
  • Another element that I found missing was any discussion of Van Gogh's brush work. Their claim is that the reason Van Gogh is so well appreciated is his use of color. Au contraire! While his use of color is spectacular, his brush work, the amount of painting he used, the thickness of the paint, and the brush strokes themselves, unmediated as it were, are a huge element - an element I would argue that is more powerful than his use of color. I love his brush strokes of flowers . . . 
  • ​Additionally, his vision of the way things look - the refraction of light around stars, the shape and nature of the clouds in some of the landscapes, the way wall paper pushes forward into the foreground, the difference in how a painting of irises looks close up and far away (abstract vs REAL - as though you are looking out a window at them) - there is SO MUCH MORE TO VAN GOGH than his use of color. How could the curators have neglected these aspects of the best painter of all time?
So I recommend that you go SEE THIS SHOW but bring your critical thinking with you. Are the opinions offered as facts actually supported by evidence? Do you appreciate Van Gogh's art because he was crazy? Or perhaps because some rich people have paid for a painting more than the gross domestic product than some of the world's poorest nations? Shun the anti-artist commentary and focus on the magnificence of Van Gogh's work.
6 Comments
Diane Charles
8/19/2021 12:05:38 am

Wow what a sophisticated review. Without access myself to that experience, I feel unable to give a reasonable response. I agree with your observation about the validity of his art by virtue of the ability to pay large sums. I am most interested in the correlations between what is happening in his life that influences his subject matter. As I mentioned to you before, brush strokes and the intensity of the art materials (brush, knife) is fascinating. I am equally interested with his deteriorating mental health. I just recently watched a film about him staring Willem De Foe called 'At Eternities Gate'. You probably have already seen it , but highly recommended if you have not. Thanks for sharing this lovely experience. BTW did you get your picture taken in the bed room? What a trip! I sure would have enjoyed that experience.

Reply
Shelley Pineo-Jensen link
8/19/2021 08:44:02 am

I did not get my picture taken in the room - I took a photo of two young women instead. I appreciate your comments. The exhibit is well worth the trouble and with a bit of critical thinking, one can avoid falling into the trap of conflating the art with the artist. The art must stand on it's on merits and then we might find the life of the artist interesting.
Dr. P-J

Reply
Diane Charles
8/19/2021 09:31:39 pm

There is no doubt at all as to the art standing on its own decades of increased interest has given him the spotlight he never received during his lifetime. I disagree with you about separating his art. It is to me like separating the artist from his soul. You can't understand the intensity without appreciated the intensity that drove him. That is what I feel when I
see his paintings.

Dr. P-J link
8/20/2021 08:13:10 am

Responding to comment:
"I disagree with you about separating his art. It is to me like separating the artist from his soul. You can't understand the intensity without appreciated the intensity that drove him. That is what I feel when I see his paintings."

So the art of Van Gogh is more appealing because he cut off his ear and gave it to a prostitute and killed himself? His passion was his manic episodes and that makes his art of greater interest?
Such a view reduces the brilliance and enduring value of Van Gogh's work to a performance of mental illness. Such a view denigrates the artist, whose work should be valued on its own merits, not on the reports of his life as told by others, as interpreted by others.

And how do you think you understand his soul? I posit that his soul is in the art - NOT in the sordid stories people tell about his life. His life's work is NOT the narrative about his life - his life's work IS THE ART!

The art must stand on its own.

Jean
8/20/2021 02:29:02 pm

That crap about his vision--I've read similar things about other artists, including Cezanne. It couldn't be that they were innovative! There must be something wrong with them! Yeah, right.

Reply
Dr. P-J link
8/23/2021 10:58:14 am

Right on, sister!

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Write something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview.

    Archives

    March 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    November 2021
    October 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Shelley Pineo-Jensen, Ph.D.